“This was an action of aliment, in which the Court found that there was a semiplena probatio, and allowed the pursuer's oath in supplement, in which she deponed affirmatively; but on a cross-examinati…”
You're reading the free summary of ROSE M'NAUGHTON, v WILLIAM GLASS (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.