“(1) Was the decision to proceed contained in the statement issued on 17 August 2016 subject to the requirements of Article 6(3) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of na…”
You're reading the free summary of Murphy, Re Judicial Review. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.