“Held (1) that C had no interest to enforce the restriction; (2) that he had no title, the restriction being merely a burden upon his lands, and not being intended as a provision in his favour with re…”
You're reading the free summary of Campbell v. Bremner. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.