“4. When the appeal came before me today, I took the view, despite the contention in the ‘Rule 24 Response’ that it was not an impermissible observation, that Judge Morrison had erred in law by expect…”
You're reading the free summary of OA198972010. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.