“[1] The defendants/counterclaimant in this action have brought 11 applications to issue writs of subpoena duces tecum and to avail of the “Khana” procedure to require the proposed respondents produce…”
You're reading the free summary of Frampton v Patrick & Ors. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.