“EXCISE DUTY– seizure of goods –refusal to restore – whether conclusion that appellant had failed to prove ownership of goods unreasonable – no – in cases where decisions were flawed decision not to r…”
You're reading the free summary of Malt Beverages BVBA v Director For Border Revenue and Revenue and Customs (EXCISE DUTY RESTORATION OF GOODS (see also EXCISE APPEAL) : Other) (Rev 1). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.