“1.3 The prosecuting guard gave evidence that CCTV footage obtained gives a clear picture of the participation of the Applicants, who were identified both by reference to this footage and by the compl…”
You're reading the free summary of Hannifin & ors v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Approved). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.