Construction

Munkenbeck & Marshall (a firm) v Harold

[2005] EWHC TCC 356High Court (Technology & Construction)2005

“IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEQUEEN'S BENCH DIVISIONTECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT Royal Courts of JusticeStrand, London, WC2A 2LL 17/03/2005 B e f o r e :”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Munkenbeck & Marshall (a firm) v Harold. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Construction cases

Kevin Demirci Properties Ltd v Huw Griffiths Architects Ltd

[2026] EWHC TCC 353

Cubic Transportation Systems Ltd v Transport for London & Anor

[2026] EWHC TCC 211

Lloyds Developments Ltd v Accor S.A

[2026] EWHC TCC 232

Crest Nicholson Regeneration Ltd & Ors v Ardmore Construction Ltd & Ors

[2026] EWHC TCC 789

One Hyde Park Limited v Laing O’Rourke Construction South Limited

[2026] EWHC 155 (TCC)

GS Woodland Court GP 1 Ltd & Anor v RGCM Ltd & Ors

[2026] EWHC TCC 351

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.