“It was answered —That it was not competent for the defender to retract the deference which had been made by his predecessor to the oath of the pursuer: 1 st , Because the principle, upon which a part…”
You're reading the free summary of DAVID STEWART GALBRAITH v MALCOLM M'NEIL (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.