“Lord Rutherfurd Clark dissented, because land was taken, and the use which might be made of it was found by the arbiter to be injurious to the rest of the estate.”
You're reading the free summary of Nisbet Hamilton v. The Commissioners of Northern Lighthouses. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.