“Held that the verdict was not ambiguous or inconsistent, that the jury necessarily negatived all negligence except the negligence they specified, that that was not in law negligence, and that accordi…”
You're reading the free summary of Taylor (Poor) v. Sutherland. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.