“By an interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary, the following issue was adjusted, and ordered to be tried by jury: ‘It being admitted that the late Matthew Bell was tenant, during the year 1833, of certain …”
You're reading the free summary of JAMES STUART and Company, & Ors, v JOHN and JAMES MILLER (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.