“This is a summons by the defendants for an application under the provisions of Rule 7/8 of the Royal Court Rules 1992 for a preliminary hearing on prescription of three years for tort and ten years f…”
You're reading the free summary of 1998/87 - Boyd v Pickersgill and Le Cornu. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.