“The Tribunal also found that the Appellant had been constructively dismissed, for the purposes of a claim of unfair dismissal, by reason of a course of conduct which included the two matters and whic…”
You're reading the free summary of De Lacey v Wechseln Ltd (t/a The Andrew Hill Salon) (EX DISCRIMINATION AND MATERNITY RIGHTS AND PARENTAL LEAVE). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.