“It was alleged by the pursuer, that the different signatures in the letter were the genuine subscription of Crawford, and that the concluding words, ‘I agree to the above,’ were also holograph of him.”
You're reading the free summary of Mrs TAYLOR or BRYSON and Husband v CRAWFORD'S TRUSTEE (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.