“It was answered —That, as the piece of ground in question had formed part of the barony of Melville, and had never been expressly conveyed away to the defenders, who consequently had no title of excl…”
You're reading the free summary of VISCOUNT MELVILLE v The TRUSTEES of ROBERT DOUGLAS & Ors (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.