“Mr Rowe said that he then seized the excise goods and the van, and later decided to restore the van as he considered it unproportionate to seize it and the gnomes bearing in mind the amount of duty e…”
You're reading the free summary of Tanner v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT(Excise) E000684 (26 March 2004). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.