“In an action of damages by the tenant of the garden against the Corporation, held (1) that even if the flooding had been caused by the sewage, the pursuer's claim would have been barred by section 28…”
You're reading the free summary of Hanley v. Edinburgh Magistrates. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.