“The disposition in favour of Mitchell, prepared by his own agent, was disconform to the articles of roup, which it narrated in terms, in so far as neither the teinds nor the sea-weed were exposed to …”
You're reading the free summary of DAVID BLAIR and Mandatary v THE MAGISTRATES AND TOWN-COUNCIL OF DUNBAR (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.