“With regard to this transaction in 1771, the pursuer averred that he had never heard of this deed till it was produced in the present process,—that no disposition had ever been granted in terms there…”
You're reading the free summary of JAMES FOGO and Mandatary, v DAVID MATHIE FOGO & Ors (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.