“Application by Billy Steel, before the Jury was empanelled and therefore in its absence, that CCTV footage taken at the time of the alleged grave and criminal assaults had not been seized, retained o…”
You're reading the free summary of AG v Steel and Anor. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.