“Held (1) that the landlord was entitled to use sequestration for his whole rent, as the tenant's claim for damages was illiquid and not exigible; (2) that the use of the sequestration and warrant the…”
You're reading the free summary of M'Laughlan v. Reilly. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.