“Held that “cost of land” in the 1897 Act meant the “purchase-money” of the 1876 Act, and that that term did not include the expenses of acquisition; that “permanent-way material” did not include ball…”
You're reading the free summary of Caledonian Railway Co. v. North British Railway Co.. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.