“In a count and reckoning betwixt these parties, a question arose, I whether Roscoe and Rigg, who are commission agents and brokers in Liverpool, had been employed, and had undertaken, as brokers, to …”
You're reading the free summary of ROSCOE and RIGG, and Mandatary, v WILLIAM RICHARDSON (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.