“Subject_Writ.— Three parties as co-obligants subscribed a document, which was not tested, purporting to bind them in payment of a sum of £80, and it was holograph of one of them—held, in an action ag…”
You're reading the free summary of Miller v Farquharson [1835] CA 13_838b (29 May 1835). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.