“Upon an application made under rule 3(10) EAT Rules 1993, the appellant’s proposed appeals against the decisions of the Employment Tribunal - (1) dismissing his claim of sex discrimination on the mer…”
You're reading the free summary of Ramos v Lady Coco Ltd (t/a Shamela's Fresh Hot and Cold Food) (Sex discrimination). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.