“‘The Lord Ordinary having considered the proof in this case and whole process, and having called the cause and heard the counsel for the pursuer, the counsel for the defender stating, that he was not…”
You're reading the free summary of Mrs HARRIET JENNER or CROFTS and Mandatary v ROBERT CROFTS and Mandatary (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.