“She stated that the identification evidence of Mr Ballentine was not of such a weak or poor quality intrinsically that it could not be left to the jury particularly in view of the evidence which was …”
You're reading the free summary of Lamont, R v. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.