“He went on to say that, unless the appellant had a separate income the appellant and sponsor would, as a married couple, be entitled to reassessment and therefore higher benefits than the sponsor rec…”
You're reading the free summary of MK (Adequacy of maintenance, disabled sponsor) Somalia. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.