“Observed that where the Lord Ordinary has disallowed an issue in toto, and his judgment is not acquiesced in, the proper method is to proceed by reclaiming note, and not by a mere motion in the Inner…”
You're reading the free summary of Hare v. Hopes. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.