“For Mr Small it was answered —That he had acted entirely upon the information of his client, Mr Scott: That the papers had been prepared by Mr Scott, and that he had presented them according to the d…”
You're reading the free summary of HENRY JOHNSTON v ARCHIBALD SCOTT and THOMAS SMALL (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.