“The question arose under this provision whether the three-fourths of the conquest payable to the children was a debt due by the deceased within the meaning of the Act 5 and 6 Vict., cap.”
You're reading the free summary of Marshall v. Lord Advocate. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.