Employment

Jackson v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke)

[2012] UKEAT 1247_10_1104Employment Appeal Tribunal2012

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Employment cases →

“On appeal, the EAT was not concerned with appeals against spent interim orders, after a substantive judgment: Edem applied.”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Jackson v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Employment cases

Pepkolaj v Barrett Steel Ltd (Practice and Procedure)

[2026] UKEAT 14

Lamb v Teva UK Ltd (Unfair Dismissal)

[2026] UKEAT 8

J Mayanja v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

[2026] EAT 7

Anea v OCS UK & I Ltd & Ors (Practice and Procedure)

[2026] UKEAT 21

MacAusland Design Limited v A Portosi

[2026] EAT 51

Chand v EE Ltd (Unfair dismissal; reason for dismissal; composite reason; fairness)

[2026] UKEAT 17

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.