“In order to address the question of proportionality correctly, the ET was required to compare the impact of the PCP on the affected group as against the importance of the legitimate aim to the employ…”
You're reading the free summary of Bradley v London School of English and Foreign Languages Ltd (SEX DISCRIMINATION - Indirect). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.