“In this case, the EAT found, in light of the primary facts as found by the ET, that the ET’s findings that it had not been reasonably practicable for the Claimant to claim in time and that the claim …”
You're reading the free summary of Cygnet Behavioural Health Ltd v Britton (Jurisdictional - Time Points). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.