“1.1 The child, whom I will refer to as Q, was brought to Poland by his mother in 2019 where the relevant Court held that he had been wrongfully removed but the defence of grave risk was established.”
You're reading the free summary of R.W. v T.W. (Child Abduction: Retained Jurisdiction Following Non-Return Order, Best Interest of the Child) (Approved). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.