“In this case, the Lord Ordinary, after having ordered condescendence and answers, pronounced an interlocutor, of consent closing the record upon the summons, defences, and relative minute for the pur…”
You're reading the free summary of GEORGE ARBUTHNOT v ROBERT KILGOUR THOM and Curatrix (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.