“The Lord Ordinary, (Lord Corehouse,) refused the bill, with expenses, and added the following note: ‘A suspension of a decree of an inferior judge, for expenses of process, is not necessarily incompe…”
You're reading the free summary of JOHN SCOTT v Mrs MARION BAILLIE & Ors (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.