“Held that the note was incompetent as being ( a) unnecessary, so far as regarded (1) the remit, since the petition in vacation automatically came up in Single Bills on the first day of session, when …”
You're reading the free summary of Belhaven Engineering and Motors, Ltd, Petitioners. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.