“CUSTOMS DUTY – refusal of restoration of goods lawfully seized - seizure of Class C drugs – mis-description of goods – drugs in question were known as “DHEA” or “Prasterone” – appellant suffering fro…”
You're reading the free summary of A Taxpayer v The Director of Border Revenue (EXCISE DUTY RESTORATION OF GOODS (see also EXCISE APPEAL) : Other). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.