“[12] After seven of the interviews referred to at para [4] during which he maintained that he was wearing Nike trainers which had disappeared, he admitted that he was in fact wearing the Reebok train…”
You're reading the free summary of Craig & Ors, R v. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.