“The defender pleaded , that the pursuer, under his present summons, could only competently obtain decree for money laid out on agricultural improvements, and not for money expended upon another and t…”
You're reading the free summary of NATHANIEL DAY COCHRANE and Factor v Sir THOMAS JOHN INGLIS COCHRANE (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.