“In an action of damages for slander by A, the Court held that he was entitled to the issue whether B's letter represented that he had no regard for truth and was a liar, and disallowed the counter-is…”
You're reading the free summary of Milne v. Walker and Wilson. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.