“What is contended by Mr John Peart SC on behalf of the respondent is that the provisions of s.11 of the 1965 Act as amended apply in this case and that accordingly no order as sought should be made.”
You're reading the free summary of A.G. v. Musinskas. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.