“Held that the Sheriff-Substitute was not bound to grant warrant to record de piano, but was entitled, in virtue of section 9 ( b) of the second schedule of the Act, to adject conditions to the granti…”
You're reading the free summary of Matthews v. William Baird & Co., Ltd. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.