“The pursuers having declined to amend their record by deleting these averments, the Court, on the ground that the averments were likely to mislead the jury, sent the case to proof before a judge.”
You're reading the free summary of Hughes v. Robertson. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.