“The Lord Ordinary's interlocutor having been submitted to review, the Court (14th November 1833) ‘having advised this case, and heard parties by their counsel, sist process until a proving of the ten…”
You're reading the free summary of JAMES MERRY v MARY DUN on MASON (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.