“This was a circumstantial case, in which a question was raised upon a bill for L.61, accepted by the defender, Easton, to his law agent, the late Alexander Ure, writer in Glasgow, (to whom the pursue…”
You're reading the free summary of Mrs MARY ROSS or URE, (Ure's Executrix) v GEORGE EASTON (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.