“EXCISE DUTY — Restoration of seized excise goods and motor vehicle — Tribunal finds that the Appellant purchased the goods for use by family — the non restoration of the motor vehicle was disproporti…”
You're reading the free summary of Singh v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT(Excise) E00782 (16 August 2004). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.