“This action was opposed by John Rymer junior and his children, who maintained, that the adjudications led against the estate of Cliftonhill, and against him, John Rymer, as fiar thereof, were incompe…”
You're reading the free summary of WADDELL AND HUSBAND, &c v RYMERS (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.